Prince William became the latest high-profile figure to enter the debate about drug legalisation after raising the question during a recent visit to Spitalfields Crypt Trust, a drug addiction charity in east London.
According to The Guardian, which covered the prince’s visit, “responses from those at the charity were mixed and the much-discussed issue continues to prove contentious among everyone, from politicians to academics, drug-users and medical experts”.
However, with the UK once again leading the way in Europe for the number of drug overdoses, and London being named the continent’s overdose capital for the third year in a row, many agree the current drug policy is not working.
What about legalising cannabis?
Last year a cross-party group of MPs including the former deputy prime minister Nick Clegg, former Conservative cabinet minister Peter Lilley and Green Party co-leader Caroline Lucas backed a report that recommended legalising cannabis.
The study, conducted by Volteface, aimed to “cultivate fresh thinking” on drug policy, in conjunction with think-tank the Adam Smith Institute, and argued that “cannabis legalisation and regulation is now inevitable”.
It called on the UK to emulate the “market-based approaches” emerging in North America, where legalised cannabis represented a market worth an estimated $7.1bn (£5.73bn) in 2016, Forbes reports.
A legal cannabis market could be worth £6.8bn in the UK and net as much as £1.05bn for the Treasury, the Daily Telegraph reports.
Those US states that have legalised the sale of marijuana issue licenses to approved retailers and sets taxes on cannabis similar to those on tobacco. In Colorado, that has generated $70m (£56.5m) for the state coffers.
The pros and cons of legalising drugs
Pro: The war on drugs creates addicts
Russell Brand, Sir Richard Branson, Sting and Michael Mansfield QC were among high-profile signatories to an open letter asking David Cameron to consider decriminalising possession of cannabis, The Independent reported last year. Cannabis has been classified as a Class B drug in the UK since 2008 and carries a prison sentence of up to five years for possession.
Release, the drugs charity which organised the letter, says arresting users "creates more harm for individuals, their families and society". It says that if users are not "caught up in the criminal justice system" they have a better chance of escaping addiction and argues that evidence from other countries supports this view. According to Release, users of ‘soft’ drugs like cannabis are more likely to try something harder, including heroin, when both are illegal.
Con: Legalising drugs would create addicts
Kevin Sabet, a leading US academic and opponent of drug liberalisation, told The Guardian: "Legal regulation has been a disaster for drugs like alcohol and tobacco. Both of those drugs are now sold by highly commercialised industries who thrive off addiction for profit." He concluded: "What we need is much smarter law-enforcement, coupled with real demand reduction in places like Europe and the US." At a time when governments are uniting to stop people smoking, should they really be becoming more laissez-faire about drug use?
Pro: If you can’t beat them, regulate them
Sir William Patey, the former UK ambassador to Afghanistan, ruffled feathers last year when he came out in favour of legalising the trade in opium poppies, from which heroin is derived. Writing in The Guardian, Patey said it was impossible to stop Afghan farmers from growing and exporting opium illegally, and concluded that "if we cannot deal effectively with supply" the only alternative is to "limit the demand for illicit drugs by making a licit supply of them available from a legally-regulated market". This would create stability and peace in drug-producing nations.
Con: Regulation may overstep the mark
The Misuse of Drugs Act of 1971 classifies drugs as illegal in the UK based on their chemical compounds. The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction says that, due to small alterations in the chemical formulae of illegal drugs, two new legal highs are discovered in Europe every week. In an effort to combat this trend, ministers have introduced a law banning all psychoactive substances, which could technically cover everything from hot chocolate to heroin, The Guardian reports. Notably, caffeine, food and nicotine are exempt. Among the proposed banned substances are drugs that have been legally sold and used in the UK for decades, such as laughing gas and poppers.
Pro: Ganja is good for business
In Jamaica, one of the major arguments in favour of decriminalising ganja, as cannabis is known there, was an economic one. As well as making possession less dangerous (it currently only results in a fine), the government has now legalised growing for medical purposes.
The island hopes for a gold-rush selling the drug to US states that allow its therapeutic use, says the Daily Telegraph. Even the US State Department acknowledges that Jamaica is the largest Caribbean supplier of marijuana to the United States.
Cons: The Pope wouldn't like it
Pope Francis has tarnished his glowing liberal credentials as the tweeting pontiff who spoke inclusively about gay people, denounced "unbridled capitalism" and reached out to Muslims, by speaking out against decriminalisation. Francis is a native of Argentina, which borders Uruguay where cannabis is now legally grown and smoked. He said legalising recreational drugs was "highly questionable" and would "fail to produce the desired effects", reported the Daily Mail. He added that legalisation was "a veiled means of surrendering to the problem".
Drug laws around the world
Jamaica decriminalised the possession of small amounts of the drug in February, and in Portugal the possession of small quantities of any drug has been decriminalised.
In December 2013, Uruguay became the first nation to make it legal to grow, consume and sell the plant. That said, all sales must pass through a government-run marketplace, and the administration has yet to set up that system.
Twenty-three US states and the District of Columbia allow marijuana for medical purposes and Washington became the first to permit the recreational use of the plant in 2012, despite a federal ban. Colorado, Oregon, Alaska and the District of Columbia have since followed suit. Cannabis went on sale in Washington in July 2014.
What happened as a result?
The legalisation of cannabis in some US states has not led to a rise in adolescent use, a US study found. It revealed that while cannabis use was generally higher in the states that had passed medical marijuana legislation before 2014, the passage of such laws did not affect the rate of marijuana use in those states.
British experts pushing for medicinal and research use of the drug welcomed the news. "Patients with... severe health problems are currently being denied effective treatment in the UK," Professor Val Curran, the UK's foremost expert on medical marijuana.
Should Cannabis Be Legalized In The UK?
At the time that this essay is being written, marijuana is an illegal drug in most parts of the world. This is something that has slowly but surely begun to change although the process is a fairly slow one. This essay aims to look argumentatively at the concept of cannabis legalization in the UK with the aim of revealing the truth of the matter.
No it should remain illegal
Marijuana has the potential to addict people who consume it. Addiction can lead to a severe loss of potential in the labor market. If cannabis were to become legal more people would be able to access it through legal channels and fall into the trap of addiction. While there is much less proof than was previously accepted that marijuana is a gateway drug to more damaging substances, on its own it has the ability to thwart ambition in those so prone.
As more people access marijuana legally, it will become easier for younger people to access it from adults to whom it has legitimately been prescribed. This could get them hooked.
Yes it should be legalized
The science behind the original criminalization of ‘weed’ is faulty and sometimes even completely false. The countries that have legalized this substance have not experienced the expected spike in crime and often quite the opposite occurs.
We should look at the methods that criminal enterprises use to acquire power. Most of the drug lords who deal in marijuana are also in possession of weapons that they use to protect it which fuels gun violence and promotes turf wars. Marijuana is a drug but it is a relatively harmless one. By keeping it illegal, we put power into the hands of criminals and take tax revenue out of the hands of government and citizens. That lost tax revenue would have been earned from a properly regulated cannabis industry.
In addition to being a relatively harmless drug, cannabis is also extremely useful medicinally. Research has proven that can be used in cancer treatments, pain management and several other highly important applications for which very expensive drugs are currently used. This has the potential to save the United Kingdom large sums of money in the provision of health care once marijuana can legally be prescribed.
There are more arguments that support the legalization of cannabis and most likely this will be the policy in less than a decade.